The Supreme Court has confirmed the judgment of YouTuber “Dallas Review,” who sought compensation from his ex-partner’s father. For 12,000 euros He is accused of violating his reputation and broadcasting the text up to four times on his channel, which currently has more than 11 million followers. A civil court judge has rejected the YouTuber’s final appeal against a Barcelona court ruling that found him guilty of insulting people affected by some of his videos.
YouTuber Daniel Saotomé, known as “Dallas Revue,” was taken to court by his former partner, the streamer’s father, also known as “Miale.” In the context of their conflict over a common pet, the YouTuber published a series of videos directly insulting his ex-partner’s father, and also used images of his father without his permission. The lawsuit was filed by attorney David Bravo.
The court unanimously declared that The Dallas Review had violated the reputation and image of those affected and must pay compensation of 12,000 euros. The Barcelona court has made it clear that it is obliged to broadcast the judgment on its channels. please don’t read it personally As the court previously stated, he has more than 11 million followers.
The streamer filed a lawsuit in the civil court of the Supreme Court, but the court dismissed the appeal. The judges of the High Court explained that the Barcelona court’s judgment “does not show any relevant objective contradiction” to the normal judicial standards regarding the contradiction between freedom of expression and honor and personal image. . The Dallas Review’s appeal was unsuccessful and he could go to the Constitutional Court, where his conviction was final and he was ordered to pay costs and must pay compensation.
That decision is Released from Facua this ThursdayAttorney David Bravo said the resolution is appropriate because he understands it is pioneering. “This sentence forces YouTubers to publish a video every week for a month on their main channel, which has more than 11 million followers,” he explains.
Various benches of the Supreme Court have issued other judgments regarding YouTubers, even banning them from uploading videos to this social network. criminal court Banned YouTuber After committing the humiliating crime of giving people cookies filled with toothpaste, he continued to upload videos to his channel for five years.
