Juana Rivas’ ex-partner Francesco Arcuri accused his mother of “kidnapping” her minor son in an Italian court after a January 8 deadline set by the Cagliari Court of Appeal had passed. Christmas vacation assumes parental authority.
The case is progressing in parallel with this charge for child abduction in Italy world And they confirmed to Europa Press from Arcuri’s lawyers that the interim injunction on the handing over of the child to the father, handed down last week by Granada’s Fourth Indication Court in Spain, is still in effect. He did so as a security guard after listening to the minor’s story following an abuse complaint filed by Juana Rivas against her ex-partner.
In the context of such crossed complaints, the final hearing regarding the custody of the minor will be held this Friday in a court in Cagliari, as the parties involved in the case confirmed to the European Press Agency. This comes after Italy’s Supreme Court accepted Juana Rivas’ appeal and ordered a reconsideration of the case and a redo of the civil trial that “separated brothers”.
The guardianship initially granted to the father by an Italian judge will remain in effect until the matter is finally resolved. A lawsuit has also been filed in this country in recent months against Arcuri over allegations of abuse against two children, but it has not yet been resolved.
In the last few hours, Juana Rivas again accuses ex-partner of sexual assault allegations He made “numerous attempts to contact her” through “repeated phone calls”, totaling “90 attempts in just 23 days”.
They are seeking an order of protection for Rivas and his children. Similarly, the father’s current system of exclusive guardianship and custody over his youngest child will be suspended. or, in any event, distance themselves so that Arcuri cannot approach or communicate directly or indirectly with Juana Rivas and her children until a definitive resolution is reached; It calls for precautions to be taken to prohibit communication.
Mr Arcuri’s lawyer said a court in Cagliari had ruled that the minor had to speak to his father every day and that he had been in direct contact with his father since leaving Italy because he had traveled to Spain with the mobile phone that was allegedly taken from Mr Arcuri. The court emphasized that the court ruled that no communication had ever taken place.
The case, which involves allegations of abuse of minors, is currently unresolved due to a jurisdictional conflict between Spanish courts. The last to speak was the magistrate of Granada’s 9th Directive Court, to whom the case was served and who agreed to abstain, suspending the processing of the case until the provincial court rules on abstention.
